X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <49AB57DD.7020106@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 22:51:57 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [1.7] rebaseall doesn't solve the problem References: <499F6682 DOT 1090204 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090224100616 DOT GC6035 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49A85971 DOT 6070300 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090228104337 DOT GG19887 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49A986B4 DOT 2080501 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090228201625 DOT GA8503 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49A9AA0C DOT 9020904 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090301102035 DOT GB10046 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20090301102035.GB10046@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> I'm open to suggestions. "peimgflags"? Currently, aslr only > > peflags? Less typing is good. > Can you tweak the tool so I can test that next week? Yes, I've finished my current round of package rebuilding; I'll try to get to peflags and peflags_all Monday PM. >> Or a separate aslrall (peimgflags(?)_all) script...it would share a lot >> of code with rebaseall, but it's not really all THAT big a script. The >> reason I didn't do that originally was I wanted to reuse the same >> (generated) filelist in each case. But, it seems that the flexibility >> in having aslrall(?) make its own file list -- which may include exe's >> as well as dll's -- is more important. > > +1 Ack. > Cygwin applications are POSIX applications which are by default > multiuser aware == TS-aware since they are written for such an > environment. Should an application *prove* to make trouble in a > TS-environment (minus the tsappcmp.dll bug) then we should try to find > out why. In that case, especially if it's a plain POSIX tool, it might > be a bug in Cygwin itself. Other than that, Cygwin and Cygwin apps are > designed to interact cleanly in a multiuser environment. It should not > matter under which account they are running, even SYSTEM. Ack. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/