X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:56:22 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [1.7] "broken" pipe implementation? Message-ID: <20090227215622.GA21254@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20090219142734 DOT GA22666 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090227005010 DOT GA11675 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:10:28AM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote: >On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 07:50:10PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>It qualifies as a "What in the world was I thinking?" problem. > >No idea what that is. Huh? Not sure how this is unclear: I made some what now seem to be brain-dead changes to cygwin and I don't understand what I was thinking when I made them. If that still isn't clear then file it under "don't need to know the details". cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/