X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <49A5F3E4.1090905@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:44:04 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090101 Remi/2.0.0.19-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: special name for vss shadow copy device? References: <87f94c370902241242q78d0d068o4416b4ae2aa9be62 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <49A59485 DOT 8090401 AT t-online DOT de> <87f94c370902251121s12579193q3032a5ce7cdef685 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <49A5CDDE DOT 4040703 AT cygwin DOT com> <87f94c370902251620h746060f8j4137fa5c3747e6e4 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <87f94c370902251620h746060f8j4137fa5c3747e6e4@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Greg Freemyer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) > wrote: >> Greg Freemyer wrote: >> >> >>> Time to experiment with Cygwin 1.7 >>> >>> I know the whole package is still considered test. How stable is the >>> actual dll(s). Especially as relates to this type of functionality. >> Difficult to say since this functionality isn't on a typical use path >> and no specific efforts have been made to 'integrate' it into Cygwin, >> whatever form that integration might take. What is clear, however, is if >> there is a problem using this functionality in 1.7, now would be the time >> to find out. Since the 1.7 DLL is near its final form for release, any >> hope of fixing problems before the release requires that they be found >> first. > > Okay, (trouble report, see the end of the email. Successes first :) > > I've got the latest 1.7 release. I'm testing right now on Vista Home. > > Just as an FYI, this machine has 32 snapshots in place. Going back to > Thanksgiving. All of these were created automatically by Vista. I > don't think I did any config work etc. to make it happen. > > I can see these from the Vista Command Prompt by running "vssadmin > list shadows". > > Very cool. > > dd seems to be working great, but I've only done a couple quick tests. > > dd if= | od -cv | less > > is showing what looks like good data. > > I tried the same with snapshot instance 33. As hoped dd came back > with an error message since that snapshot does not exist. > > I currently have 5 dd's running against 5 different snapshots and the > output going to /dev/null. Per task manager all are actively > reading data. Very cool. They are reading very slowly, but then > again I'm beating the heck out of the drive. > > I tried the "dosdev" trick from one of the links to mount the snapshot > as V:. Apparently that is a XP only trick. Or at least Vista does > not have it. > > From the Vista command prompt I can do: > mklink /d C:\shadow_copy21 \\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy21\ > > and then cd into that directory and see my old snapshot data. I can > also see it from the Vista file explorer. > > From cygwin's shell if I try to do so I get: > $ cd /cygdrive/c/shadow_copy21 > bash: cd: /cygdrive/c/shadow_copy21: No such file or directory > > I assume that should work? Dunno. I can't get the 'cd' or 'dir' to work from the Vista command prompt. For me, 'dir foo' (I named the link 'foo') gives me 'File Not Found'. So in my case, what you see from Cygwin makes sense since it's consistent with what Windows tells me. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/