X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <49A5CDDE.4040703@cygwin.com> References: <87f94c370902241242q78d0d068o4416b4ae2aa9be62 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <49A59485 DOT 8090401 AT t-online DOT de> <87f94c370902251121s12579193q3032a5ce7cdef685 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <49A5CDDE DOT 4040703 AT cygwin DOT com> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:20:53 -0500 Message-ID: <87f94c370902251620h746060f8j4137fa5c3747e6e4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: special name for vss shadow copy device? From: Greg Freemyer To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > Greg Freemyer wrote: > > >> Time to experiment with Cygwin 1.7 >> >> I know the whole package is still considered test. =A0How stable is the >> actual dll(s). =A0Especially as relates to this type of functionality. > > Difficult to say since this functionality isn't on a typical use path > and no specific efforts have been made to 'integrate' it into Cygwin, > whatever form that integration might take. =A0What is clear, however, is = if > there is a problem using this functionality in 1.7, now would be the time > to find out. =A0Since the 1.7 DLL is near its final form for release, any > hope of fixing problems before the release requires that they be found > first. Okay, (trouble report, see the end of the email. Successes first :) I've got the latest 1.7 release. I'm testing right now on Vista Home. Just as an FYI, this machine has 32 snapshots in place. Going back to Thanksgiving. All of these were created automatically by Vista. I don't think I did any config work etc. to make it happen. I can see these from the Vista Command Prompt by running "vssadmin list shadows". Very cool. dd seems to be working great, but I've only done a couple quick tests. dd if=3D | od -cv | less is showing what looks like good data. I tried the same with snapshot instance 33. As hoped dd came back with an error message since that snapshot does not exist. I currently have 5 dd's running against 5 different snapshots and the output going to /dev/null. Per task manager all are actively reading data. Very cool. They are reading very slowly, but then again I'm beating the heck out of the drive. I tried the "dosdev" trick from one of the links to mount the snapshot as V:. Apparently that is a XP only trick. Or at least Vista does not have it. =46rom the Vista command prompt I can do: mklink /d C:\shadow_copy21 \\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy21\ and then cd into that directory and see my old snapshot data. I can also see it from the Vista file explorer. =46rom cygwin's shell if I try to do so I get: $ cd /cygdrive/c/shadow_copy21 bash: cd: /cygdrive/c/shadow_copy21: No such file or directory I assume that should work? Thanks Greg --=20 Greg Freemyer Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer First 99 Days Litigation White Paper - http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf The Norcross Group The Intersection of Evidence & Technology http://www.norcrossgroup.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/