X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:32:03 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [CFT] libtool on nix->cygwin cross, with wine Message-ID: <20090225033203.GC18395@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <49A37F05 DOT 8050900 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090224123655 DOT dd559d60 DOT Rhubbell AT iHubbell DOT com> <49A46366 DOT 5050605 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20090224133507 DOT 543ed1cf DOT Rhubbell AT iHubbell DOT com> <87f94c370902241433h7701dae1lc652feb0abae8eae AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20090224190505 DOT fb3c9784 DOT Rhubbell AT iHubbell DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090224190505.fb3c9784.Rhubbell@iHubbell.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 07:05:05PM -0800, rhubbell wrote: >On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:33:53 -0500 >Greg Freemyer wrote: >>A lot of Linux mailing lists have that policy. Especially if it is >>high volume or has a large subscriber base. The idea is that someone >>can read a single email and understand it without having to bounce all >>over the place. > >I was mostly noticing how frequent the "list policing" is here. And >also what hypocrites there are too. Look at your .sig, a lot of >useless information, but you send it every time. What you notice is not of any interest here. Please stop this off-topic discussion. Warning #1. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/