X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <49A22417.2040501@bmts.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:20:39 -0500
From: Ralph Hempel <rhempel AT bmts DOT com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Setup - command line only
References: <49A1DF61 DOT 5000509 AT gmail DOT com> <49A20419 DOT 4050603 AT cygwin DOT com> <49A21B54 DOT 1030305 AT bmts DOT com> <49A2207E DOT 6030804 AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <49A2207E.6030804@cygwin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-brucetelecom.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Bruce Telecom 519.368.2000 for more information
X-brucetelecom.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-brucetelecom.com-MailScanner-From: rhempel AT bmts DOT com
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> Ralph Hempel wrote:
>> Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>
>>> No, it's only the 289th time, which probably accounts for why you 
>>> couldn't
>>> find it with Google. ;-)  These kinds of features are missing from
>>> 'setup.exe' because there hasn't been a volunteer contributor for them.
>>> If you're interested in contributing something, see the link below:
>>
>> OK, the update of setup is not supported, but setup DOES in fact
>> allow fully command line based operation. I know because I moaned
>> about it, collected and tested patches, and even contributed a minor
>> fix to the option parsing.
> 
> That's true but I believe the OP was lamenting that there wasn't a
> version that didn't still have the GUI even when run from the command
> line.  If I'm wrong, then I'm sure you've made the OP's day. :-)

That's what I like about this list - there's always another way to
interpret a question.

For me, the fact that I can now drive setup using a command line is
good enough. The fact that the GUI is still visible and being driven
by the magic command line incantation is a non-issue for me :-)

Ralph

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/