X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <499ED311.5000209@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:58:09 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: file-5.00-1 References: <499E2B9A DOT 5030907 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090220095916 DOT GA759 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <499EB5A6 DOT 5000707 AT gmail DOT com> <499EBABE DOT 8080303 AT gmail DOT com> <499EC6E5 DOT 5000408 AT gmail DOT com> <20090220152330 DOT GG24834 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20090220152330.GG24834@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> Take-home point: never use -static-libgcc when building a DLL. > > Baeh. The two of us discussed this in PM a couple of days back and I > still don't like the idea to depend on cyggcc_s.dll for more or less > every other package providing a DLL. Nah, I think I was expressing that too strongly. I guess if something's only pulling in a few math functions from the DLL, it shouldn't need to do so dynamically if it doesn't want to. I'll find a way to make this usage work under rebasing. cheers, DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/