X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <499EB6DD.1080305@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:57:49 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Windows Mobile? References: <2638D07BD46A48F6A2EFD3165EA6130B AT luggage> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Vincent R. wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:20:41 -0000, "Harold Fuchs" wrote: >> Are there any plans to port Cygwin to Windows Mobile? Dates? Not that I know of. >> If not, I'd be interested to know why. Well, the reason I wasn't planning to do it is because I don't ever use Windows Mobile. I can't speak for anyone else of course. > You can already use cegcc, don't see the point to port cygwin. Huh? You can already use MinGW on ordinary windows, but there was a point in writing Cygwin in the first place. Neither cegcc nor MinGW give you a Posix API and environment; that's what Cygwin does on non-mobile Windows, and that's what would be the point of porting it to Mobile Windows. Am I missing something here? cheers, DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/