X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <497FE127.1010705@sbcglobal.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:37:59 +0000 From: Greg Chicares User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: RFD: cygwin + *native* MinGW compiler References: <497FC147 DOT 306 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> In-Reply-To: <497FC147.306@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2009-01-28 02:21Z, Charles Wilson wrote: > Pursuant to a discussion on the libtool list, I'm trying to get a feel > for how many cygwin users rely on the cygwin environment to drive the > *native* MinGW gcc compiler. I use the native MinGW compiler in a Cygwin environment, successfully, many hours every day. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/