X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <497EBC32.7090906@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:48:02 +1100 From: David Billinghurst User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Fwd: [Clamav-devel] Bug#512776: License incompatibility with libgmp ("GPLv2 only" linking to "LGPLv3 or later") References: <497E130E DOT 4090609 AT x-ray DOT at> In-Reply-To: <497E130E.4090609@x-ray.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Reini Urban wrote: > Attached is a clamav license incompatibility bug with libgmp from the > debian lawyers. clamav might be forced to link against an older libgmp. > > The switch to LGPL3 came with gmp-4.2.2, so gmp-4.2.1 would be needed > for clamav compatibility. But prev is gmp-4.2.3-1, so we might need a > new gmp-compat package based on gmp-4.2.1. I can provide this if required, but I don't want to rush into it. Some questions come to mind: - what should it be called? gmp-compat? - where should we install it? /opt/gmp-compat/{lib,include} - would a static library suitable? No run time dependency, and we won't be upgrading it. David -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/