X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <497E8BA8.4060907@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:20:56 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090101 Remi/2.0.0.19-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: syntax highlighting on Joe References: <497E07CC DOT 3000700 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Julio Emanuel wrote: > I also would like to grab this opportunity to (once again) ring the > service bell to whoever maintain this package 'joe'. > It's my favorite (actually the only) editor in the Unix/Cygwin ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Perhaps it's your only favorite editor but it is not the only editor in the Unix, Linux, or Cygwin environments, in case anyone gets the wrong immression. ;-) > environments, and that's unfortunate to see this package negleted, > because this seems to be a simple packaging problem. Also, currently > the upstream version is already 3.7 (TWO versions beyond the Cygwin > current!). > > Could all this whining give us "joe'ers" a brand new version of this > package? Pretty Please? :) If this really is just a packaging issue, you may have better luck reporting it to the cygwin-apps list (where packaging issues are on- topic). Jari has responded to things there of-late. Of course, if you're desperate for a newer 'joe' and aren't going to build it yourself, you can take advantage of the version packaged and announced here: Of course, if you go this route, you can't come back to this list with your "whining" if something doesn't work. Perhaps it's a small price to pay. ;-) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/