X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <497D1290.2040601@columbus.rr.com> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:32:00 -0500 From: Paul McFerrin Reply-To: pmcferrin AT columbus DOT rr DOT com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: dislikes with vim 7.2 References: <497CF8AF DOT 2060204 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> <2bf229d30901251713l7033cc7fldf47b6b4c6e19278 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20090126011927 DOT GA10425 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20090126011927.GA10425@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com I was vim had it's own separate mailing list. BTW: What if RTFM ?? Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 08:13:31PM -0500, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 06:41:35PM -0500, Paul McFerrin wrote: >> >>> I don't like changes in "default" behavior of certain programs. Vim7.2 >>> is one. >>> >> Given that this post was entirely Vim specific, it would probably get >> better attention on the vim mailing lists, as opposed to the Cygwin >> list. >> > > Either that or RTFM. > > cgf > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/