X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <497B9A91.8040003@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:47:45 +1100 From: David Billinghurst User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: access() function in 1.7 References: <497AC602 DOT 6050709 AT gmail DOT com> <20090124091349 DOT GB17576 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20090124091349.GB17576@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 24 18:40, David Billinghurst wrote: >> I am having a problem with the access() function in cygwin-1.7. >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38956 >> [...] >> Under cygwin-1.5 >> $ ./test_access >> access = -1 >> >> Under cygwin-1.7 >> $ ./test_access.exe >> access = -1 > > I assume you mean "access = 0" under 1.7. If that's what you see, the > test probably works as designed. You're running the test under an > administrative account. Admin accounts have always the right to write, > same as under Linux. > > > Corinna > The account does have Local Administrator rights. Thank you for the explanation. David -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/