X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BARRACUDA_BRBL,BAYES_05,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Andrew DeFaria <Andrew AT DeFaria DOT com>
Subject:  Re: paste into vim
Date:  Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:03:35 -0700
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <glcpoq$bhe$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <416096c60901200147g66109423r1f0bab88b3c17e08 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <574BF80562AF37419EA4B003C90D756D06E2866B AT EXCHANGE1 DOT belgium DOT fhm DOT de> 	 <5a05e0e60901200921t3dff188fg7df2b53104dc3d23 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <gl7fbi$g42$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> 	 <5a05e0e60901211350h795e72f2oa36e2fe83b73e6de AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <gla48l$8g4$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <2ca21dcc0901220905y23f5011boc61d6e12f490a357 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
In-Reply-To: <2ca21dcc0901220905y23f5011boc61d6e12f490a357@mail.gmail.com>
X-Stationery: 0.4.8.12
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Dave Korn wrote:
>> If you didn't get an insert key then you got ripped off however I 
>> think you may just be looking in the wrong place, By Logitiech Y-SZ49 
>> did you mean this one: http://cafe.mobil.hr/showthread.php?t=49534 ? 
>> Because if you did I see an insert key there, right below prt scrn.
> Nah, there's a different model where for some completely nutso reason 
> they decided to get rid of the Ins. key so they could have a 
> double-height Del. instead!
>
> http://www.mf-daten.de/catalog/images/b177.jpg
Like I said, you got ripped off! I'm such such keyboards are very popular!
> OP will have to use the numpad Ins., I guess.
Exactly.
-- 
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
It's not an optical illusion. It just looks like one.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/