X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:14:16 +0100
From: Carsten Hey <c DOT hey AT web DOT de>
To: Sjors Gielen <mailinglist AT dazjorz DOT com>, debian-devel AT lists DOT debian DOT org,
   cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Hosting the Debian/kCygwin port?
Message-ID: <20090121101416.GG15594@foghorn.stateful.de>
References: <49751189 DOT 5050609 AT dazjorz DOT com> <20090121094825 DOT GF15594 AT foghorn DOT stateful DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090121094825.GF15594@foghorn.stateful.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Sender: c DOT hey AT web DOT de
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Sjors Gielen wrote:
> ... but the Cygwin packages are different from their Debian
> counterparts (think patches), and I'm not sure how that happens with
> other ports. debian-devel, is this a problem?

No, this is no problem. Debian GNU/kFreeBSD also uses additional
patches.

Carsten

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/