X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Reply-To: <cygwin-talk AT cygwin DOT com>
From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT att DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <loom DOT 20090109T165716-58 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <gk9b96$lvr$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <20090110052756 DOT GA18825 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <gkapq1$df3$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <20090110191452 DOT GB4457 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <gkatjj$ol9$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <20090110225438 DOT GB7376 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <gkb9tt$29j$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <20090111015206 DOT GA7967 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <FA0B73715ACA4B09AB3610EB2AB1720A AT DFW5RB41> <20090111032128 DOT GA8197 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Subject: RE: MinTTY 0.3.3
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:35:07 -0600
Message-ID: <6D92A8CEE3534E62A4637BBBA4FD9A3C@DFW5RB41>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20090111032128.GA8197@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam

> From:  Christopher Faylor
> 
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 09:00:06PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> >> From: Christopher Faylor
> >> 
> >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 04:10:53PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> >> >Out of here...
> >> 
> >> If only that was really true.
> >
> >I thought there was a specific mailing list where such 
> >Cygwin-related-content-free urinating contests were more 
> appropriately 
> >held.  I must have been misled.
> 
> I think your confusion is pretty well documented by now.
> 
> I can only speculate on your lack of embarrassment about the 
> frequent public displays of confusion however.
> 
> cgf
> 

Should you wish to continue the aforementioned contest and/or send more
silly passive-aggressive insults my way, please do so on the cygwin-talk@
list.  For your convenience, and for the benefit of the readers of the
cygwin@ list, I have set followups accordingly.

Thank you for your cooperation in keeping the cygwin@ list a place where
Cygwin-related issues can be discussed with a minimum of topic-free
distractions.

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle
 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/