X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:14:52 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: MinTTY 0.3.3 Message-ID: <20090110191452.GB4457@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <495917BA DOT 1090401 AT gmail DOT com> <49613928 DOT 503 AT gmail DOT com> <4966897B DOT 2010805 AT gmail DOT com> <49671BCF DOT 7010808 AT alcatel-lucent DOT it> <20090110052756 DOT GA18825 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Note-from-DJ: This may be spam On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:35:44AM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 10:21:42PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >>> Michael Lemke wrote: >>>> I just don't get it. What's wrong with rxvt? I've been using it for >>>> years as my only terminal for cygwin and never understood why it isn't >>>> the default. >>> While I agree, rxvt does have problems with programs written for the DOS >>> style console output (e.g. cleartool from IBM/Rational Clearcase and >>> others). >> >>...and if you were paying attention you'd know that MinTTY is going to >>have the same problems... > >And I was paying attention to which I'd add: MinTTY also probably won't >become Cygwin's default! This is YA point that has already been made. You are not adding anything new here. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/