X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4961C7FD.2000509@bonhard.uklinux.net> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:42:37 +0000 From: Fergus User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin ML CC: Fergus Subject: Cygwin on a mobile drive: formatting options? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Rather than install and maintain Cygwin on several desktop machines that I use, I travel from one to another with one copy of Cygwin on a mobile drive. This is formatted FAT32 as I don't need the grief NTFS provides for file access and attribution. A 40G drive is glacier-shift slow, a 100G drive was lightning, and the latest 500G drive is slow. All 3 are formatted using Linux fdisk + mkdosfs, as this is so reliable. To my surprise all 3 drives allow the user to select either FAT32 (option "b" in fdisk) or FAT32(LBA) (option "c"). ["Surprise" because naively I thought LBA was an engineering option restricted to large capacity magnetic drives only, and not solid state flash drives like the 40G.] Question: Can anybody tell me whether "b" or "c" is better for access speed or offers any perceptible advantage over the other? I don't mind being told to pursue this thread on cygwin-talk [but it is not intended to be "funny", apparently a requirement of that list] or being told that it is off-topic, in which case where should it be pursued? Thank you. Fergus -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/