X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Trace: 119772084/mk-filter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/79.66.17.75/None/johne53 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 79.66.17.75 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: johne53 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk X-MUA: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAJK2UUlPQhFL/2dsb2JhbACEVboCWJEzhkI Message-ID: <006b01c965c1$6a7c6300$4001a8c0@mycomputer> From: "John Emmas" To: Subject: Cygwin struct alignment Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:16:14 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Note-from-DJ: This may be spam A program I'm building connects to a (Cygwin) server and receives the address of a shared memory segment. The memory contains an array of struct and you probably know that Microsoft (by default) aligns structure members on 8-byte boundaries (sometimes called 8-byte packing). As things stand, both client and server use System V shared memory and everything works well if I compile under Cygwin or Linux. Ultimately however, there'll be no Linux clients. The clients will either be Cygwin clients or Windows clients. Therefore I'm currently experimenting to see if I can change the server to use Windows shared memory (only under Cygwin of course - not for Linux use). This all seems to be going well - but I was surprised to find that I need to compile the Windows clients using MSVC's default (8-byte) struct alignment. I'd assumed that Cygwin probably wouldn't use structure packing (only because I don't think Linux does). But I only get meaningful data with 8-byte packing. It looks as if Cygwin's compiler must default to 8-byte packing too. Does that make sense? Thanks, John -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/