X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:47:11 +0200
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Subject: Re: POP Rmail in Emacs [Attn: Emacs maintainer]
In-reply-to: <494C307C.6020604@cornell.edu>
X-012-Sender: halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id: <uej03dq68.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <494C1451 DOT 5050703 AT alice DOT it> <494C307C DOT 6020604 AT cornell DOT edu>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:38:36 -0500
> From: Ken Brown <kbrown at cornell dot edu>
> 
> On 12/19/2008 4:38 PM, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> > ...and, last but not least, yes we need a Cygwin Emacs maintainer:
> 
> There *is* an official emacs maintainer, Steffen Sledz

Let me rephrase: we need a more active maintainer of the Cygwin Emacs.

As a matter of fact, reports of Cygwin-related problems on the Emacs
development and bug-reporting lists don't get any responses from
Steffen Sledz.  Searching the emacs-devel and bug-gnu-emacs archives
for his name yields zero hits.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/