X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: David Abrahams <dave AT boostpro DOT com>
Subject:  Rationale for line-ending recommendation?
Date:  Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:42:20 -0900
Lines: 12
Message-ID:  <877i5wlwc3.fsf@mcbain.luannocracy.com>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com


Can anyone explain why the installer began recommending using *nix line
ending conventions?  DOS-compatible endings have always "just worked"
for me and I've heard of lots of problems doing it the now-recommended
way.  See
http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3ca61d44020812070523t3778f924m1a179f75d879775c%40mail.gmail.com%3e
for reference

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/