X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4946B370.8040206@cornell.edu> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:43:44 -0500 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [1.7] Problem - emacs fails to get shell-command output References: <4941587D DOT 5070109 AT cornell DOT edu> <17393e3e0812111130n3dda8d05n8465481c68b97596 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <49457F56 DOT 1040508 AT cornell DOT edu> <20081215135249 DOT GV32197 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49467903 DOT 2090104 AT cornell DOT edu> In-Reply-To: <49467903.2090104@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 12/15/2008 10:34 AM, Ken Brown wrote: > On 12/15/2008 8:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Dec 14 16:49, Ken Brown wrote: >>> On 12/11/2008 2:30 PM, Matt Wozniski wrote: >>>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Ken Brown wrote: >>>>> One other thing I've noticed, which I think is unrelated, is that >>>>> there is a >>>>> glitch in directory listing in emacs under cygwin 1.7: If you try >>>>> to list a >>>>> directory with control-x d, very often the directory listing makes >>>>> it look >>>>> like the directory is empty when it isn't. Typing "g" (to ask >>>>> emacs to >>>>> redisplay the directory) usually results in a correct listing. >>>>> [...] >>>> With no knowledge of cygwin's internals, I'd much sooner guess the >>>> changes to the pipe code... >>> I should have just reported the symptom instead of trying to guess >>> the cause: Emacs runs the shell command "ls -al" and thinks there's >>> no output. Here's a second example. I used emacs's "ediff" function >>> to compare two buffers, and it reported (incorrectly) that there were >>> no differences. So it seems that emacs called on the shell to run >>> "diff" but didn't get the output. >> >> Any chance to create a testcase which reproduces this behaviour without >> involving emacs? Emacs is hell of a testcase which I won't even touch >> with gloves... > > Unfortunately, I have virtually no programming experience. I was hoping > the emacs maintainer might be able to help. Here's one more piece of information, in case it means something to the experts. I had been building emacs with the following patch, which was given to me by the person who told me how to build emacs for cygwin: --- strftime.c.orig 2007-01-14 04:24:37.000000000 +0100 +++ strftime.c 2008-02-04 21:40:01.031250000 +0100 @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ # endif #endif #if HAVE_TZNAME -#ifndef USE_CRT_DLL +#if !defined (USE_CRT_DLL) && !defined (CYGWIN) extern char *tzname[]; #endif #endif I just rebuilt emacs under cygwin 1.7 without that patch. The glitch involving directory listings still occurs occasionally, but *much* less often. It happens so much less often that I was about to send a message saying the problem was solved, but then it happened again. Two questions: 1. For the sake of my education, can someone explain to me what this patch is all about and whether it ought to be necessary for cygwin? (I'm compiling with gcc-4, if that makes a difference.) 2. Does the fact that my problem occurs less often without the patch provide any clues? Thanks. Ken -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/