X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:20:25 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: coreutils-7.0-1 Message-ID: <20081216092025.GA15438@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi Eric, On Dec 15 20:49, Eric Blake wrote: > For those people testing cygwin 1.7, a new release of coreutils, 7.0-1, > has been uploaded, > [...] > This release also takes advantage of > the new d_type support to speed up several utilities; one notable > exception, unfortunately, is that the Linux patch to use d_type and inode > sorting to speed up rm from quadratic to linear on directories with a > large number of files did not apply to cygwin because of differences in > statfs. -v? Is that something we can support by tweaking Cygwin? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/