X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: References: <20081210203400 DOT GA15192 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <494061C2 DOT 9070306 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20081211025042 DOT GA3571 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <494092AE DOT 6060902 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20081211091718 DOT GE15192 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Subject: RE: Public Cygwin 1.7 test starts today Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:59:00 -0600 Message-ID: <62E5192A6E10484E881E2E521557F533@DFW5RB41> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20081211091718.GE15192@calimero.vinschen.de> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > From: Corinna Vinschen [snip] > > Do you have a sense for what would make the next major release > > cygwin2.dll and not cygwin1.dll? Obviously an API or ABI breakage > > would require a new DLL name, but do you have something on the wish > > list that would require that, which was put off this time around? > > Windows will run under Cygwin 2.0 instead of vice versa. > Now THAT'S comedy! ;-))) Well, unless you were serious, in which case it's still good comedy. -- Gary R. Van Sickle -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/