X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Will Parsons Subject: Re: cygwin and cygwin-xfree lists to merge Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <20081210174922 DOT GA2339 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Reply-To: ellenophilos AT yahoo DOT com User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor wrote: > The historical reasons for merging the cygwin and cygwin-xfree lists no > longer seems to exist so I am contemplating merging the two lists. > > If anyone has a compelling reason why this should not happen please send > it to one of the two lists. If I don't hear a coherent argument against > doing this, I'll throw the switch over the weekend. > > Btw, I'm only mildly sympathetic to arguments like "It will be more > email for me". I'm more concerned with having to constantly shuttle > people back and forth between the two lists. Unless there is a > compelling argument to the contrary, I think that the fact that people > are confused about which list to use outweighs the increase in email > traffic for people who just want to hear about cygwin/x. You may not consider it a compelling argument, but I find the traffic on the cygwin list more than enough already, and am glad I don't have to bother about the cygwin-xfree traffic. I'd prefer to keep things as is. -- Will -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/