X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <20860739.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:18:40 -0800 (PST)
From: PPPP <plui31 AT yahoo DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Application causes STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION in Windows 2008
In-Reply-To: <49394FE3.2000806@cygwin.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <20843624 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <49385A32 DOT 9090004 AT cygwin DOT com> <20855414 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <49394FE3 DOT 2000806 AT cygwin DOT com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com




Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> 
> PPPP wrote:
>> 
>> Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps a better question is why do you think investigating this problem
>>> would be different with Cygwin than with any other non-Cygwin
>>> application?
>>> If you find there is something Cygwin-specific in this process that's
>>> confusing you, it might help us understand you better if you
>>> reformulated
>>> the question with your specific issues stated.
>>>
>>>
>> 
>> That's a good point.  I don't know for sure it's Cygwin.  What I wanted
>> to
>> do was to use strace on the process and see if I can find out what it's
>> doing.  When I tried to do that, it would say cannot attach to process. 
>> I
>> tried using "strace -p" as well as starting the process with strace.  The
>> problem I had with starting the process with strace is that with the
>> arguments I'm passing to the process, strace didn't like it.  I tried
>> putting quotes around the start command as well.  That's where I'm
>> stuck...
> 
> So what's the command line you're using?  Does the following work for
> you?
> 
>    strace -o ls.out ls /usr
> 
> 

Thanks Larry.  I ran your command and I was able to strace something.  Here
is the output of the strace:

--- Process 1052, exception C0000005 at 610610C5
--- Process 3572, exception 000006BA at 76A8F35F
--- Process 3572, exception 000006BA at 76A8F35F
--- Process 3572, exception 000006BA at 76A8F35F
--- Process 3572, exception 000006BA at 76A8F35F
--- Process 3572, exception 000006BA at 76A8F35F
--- Process 3572, exception 000006BA at 76A8F35F
--- Process 3572, exception 000006BA at 76A8F35F
--- Process 3572, exception 000006BA at 76A8F35F
--- Process 3572, exception 000006BA at 76A8F35F
--- Process 3572, exception 000006BA at 76A8F35F
--- Process 3572, exception 000006BA at 76A8F35F
--- Process 3572, exception 000006BA at 76A8F35F
--- Process 3572, exception 000006BA at 76A8F35F
--- Process 3572, exception 000006BA at 76A8F35F
--- Process 3572, exception C0000005 at 004096B6


Which isn't very useful...how should I tackle this?
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Application-causes-STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION-in-Windows-2008-tp20843624p20860739.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/