X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:00:02 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: sem_unlink?
Message-ID: <20081201110002.GJ12905@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20081127231651 DOT GB6403 AT const DOT famille DOT thibault DOT fr> <20081128021823 DOT GG16768 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20081128090927 DOT GC5154 AT const DOT bordeaux DOT inria DOT fr> <20081128092556 DOT GB12905 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20081128162039 DOT GA21423 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20081128162039.GA21423@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Nov 28 11:20, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:25:56AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Nov 28 10:09, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> Christopher Faylor, le Thu 27 Nov 2008 21:18:23 -0500, a ?crit :
> >> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:16:51AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> > >There is no sem_unlink function, is there a reason or is that a PTW?
> >> > 
> >> > PTC.  It's not easy to get right in a Windows environment.  If I read
> >> > what's required correctly it could require interprocess communication.
> >> 
> >> Mmm, I haven't tested (and can't right now), but does that mean that
> >> even if sem_open() is currently provided, it does not work?
> >
> >The POSIX semaphore implementation is incomplete in terms of named
> >semaphores up to Cygwin 1.5.25.  Cygwin 1.7.0 provides all functions,
> >including sem_unlink.
> 
> Sorry for the misinformation.  I completely missed the sem_unlink that
> was right there on my screen.

No worries.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/