X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:18:23 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: sem_unlink? Message-ID: <20081128021823.GG16768@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20081127231651 DOT GB6403 AT const DOT famille DOT thibault DOT fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081127231651.GB6403@const.famille.thibault.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:16:51AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: >Hello, > >There is no sem_unlink function, is there a reason or is that a PTW? PTC. It's not easy to get right in a Windows environment. If I read what's required correctly it could require interprocess communication. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/