X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <490A91D7.60202@cygwin.com> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:04:23 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080723 Fedora/2.0.0.16-1.fc8 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin Line Feed/ Carriage Return Help References: <20253754 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <490A3575 DOT 9010103 AT cygwin DOT com> <20259889 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <490A90D9 DOT 7060407 AT sbcglobal DOT net> In-Reply-To: <490A90D9.7060407@sbcglobal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Greg Chicares wrote: > On 2008-10-31 04:02Z, sandsturm wrote: [...] > > Your reply didn't make it here from nabble.com: all I see, even > in the raw message source [1], is a full quote of Larry's message. > It might be better to join the mailing list. Here's what appeared > only on nabble.com [reformatted]: Good of you to forward/translate for us Greg. I did find the response that made it to the list to be less informative. ;-) Just as a point of reference, there's no pressing need to join the list if someone really doesn't want to. Sending to cygwin at cygwin dot com is allowed by anyone, even if they don't join the list. But there is a higher spam filtering bar that has to be scaled in that case. > | Hi Larry > | > | Thanks for the fast reply. I tried to reinstall cygwin in UNIX Mode, > | because I think this is the point where it fails. But reinstallation > | (after deleting cygwin folder, service and cygwin registry) didn't > | solved my problem. So then I'd say it makes sense to follow through with the recommendations of the rest of my original reply, sandstrum. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/