X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <48F6A9D5.20900@cornell.edu> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:41:25 -0400 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Headers not found when gcc4 installed without gcc3 References: <48F648E0 DOT 7040807 AT cornell DOT edu> <024801c92f1b$46bacec0$9601a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> In-Reply-To: <024801c92f1b$46bacec0$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 10/15/2008 7:10 PM, Dave Korn wrote: > there's no way on earth that installing Gcc-3 should > cause any X-related headers to be pulled in. Both setup.hints for gcc-core > and gcc4-core pull in w32api, and that's it by the way of headers. > > Is it perhaps possible that your initial install failed to completely run > and the second time round setup.exe got the missing bits anyway - only > coincidentally at the same time as you installed gcc-core? It's possible. What puzzles me, though, is that the X11 headers were never missing; they were in /usr/X11R6/include all along. [Maybe I didn't make that clear in my original post.] It's just that those headers weren't found by the configure script. So I thought that the installation of gcc-core might have done something to get the (already existing) headers into the search path for headers. Is that impossible? Ken -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/