X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <20080917053022.97813.qmail@web3310.mail.ogk.yahoo.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:30:22 +0900 (JST)
From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA <tmacchant2 AT yahoo DOT co DOT jp>
Reply-To: matsuoka AT nuce DOT nagoya-u DOT ac DOT jp
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated experimental package: gcc4-4.3.2-1 (Why thread model is single?)
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: matsuoka AT nuce DOT nagoya-u DOT ac DOT jp
In-Reply-To: <48CDC8BE.8040300@users.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hello

I have a simple question of the thead model of gcc-4.

At gcc v3 on cygwin thead model is posix.
$ gcc-4 -v 
 :
Thread model: single

Is there any reason to be a single thread model for gcc-4?

Regards

Tatsuro


--------------------------------------
Enjoy MLB with MAJOR.JP! Ichiro, Matsuzaka, Matsui, and more!
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/mlb/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/