X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <48CDFE5B.777A1567@dessent.net> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:19:07 -0700 From: Brian Dessent X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated experimental package: gcc4-4.3.2-1 References: <48CD8D8A DOT 2050900 AT alice DOT it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Angelo Graziosi wrote: > But: Why 'alternatives'? Because it allows for the user to configure a preference rather than ramming it down their throat. > Why, in Cygwin, we can't have gcc.exe (i.e 4.3.2) and gcc-3.4.exe, etc... That's exactly what you would get when using alternatives. You would always be able to use the names gcc-4.3 and gcc-3.4 if you want to refer to a specific version. But you would also be able to configure what the plain "gcc" maps to, so you can have yours set to 4.3 and someone else can have it set to something else, so that they don't have to repeatedly "./configure CC=the-other-gcc" because they wanted a different version than what the package manager decided to call "gcc". Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/