X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: References: <48C8FE4D DOT 1090103 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <013401c9140b$22b569c0$9601a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <48CA1F81 DOT 3070802 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New experimental package: gcc4-4.3.0-1 Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:51:33 +0100 Message-ID: <019201c914bd$23d02db0$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <48CA1F81.3070802@users.sourceforge.net> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote on 12 September 2008 08:51: >> Because I didn't use libtool to do it. I think Aaron's patch to build >> libgcc shared from upstream does it properly, so I'll be adopting it if >> I can, otherwise I'll just crudely bodge it in. > > Since the name of the libgcc dll is manually specified in > gcc/config/i386/{cygwin.h,t-cygwin}, isn't it just a matter of changing > those to cyggcc_s-1.dll? Or am I missing something? I just don't know whether or not the version is embedded in the generated DLL anywhere other than the name, so far. >> Didn't look at fortran and objc. > > Presuming that F95 and ObjC/ObjC++ don't have the problem with overrides > that C++ has, it should be as simple as adding the -no-undefined flag. I would anticipate so. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/