X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <48AED6DC.7040703@bmts.com> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:10:20 -0400 From: Ralph Hempel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin compiler and linker options References: <4126b3450808220352y12a25fddi444e3df3e1cb590a AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <002f01c90456$1f080e50$4001a8c0 AT mycomputer> <5E25AF06EFB9EA4A87C19BC98F5C8753014F88E0 AT core-email DOT int DOT ascribe DOT com> In-Reply-To: <5E25AF06EFB9EA4A87C19BC98F5C8753014F88E0@core-email.int.ascribe.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-brucetelecom.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Bruce Telecom 519.368.2000 for more information X-brucetelecom.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-brucetelecom.com-MailScanner-From: rhempel AT bmts DOT com X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Phil Betts wrote: > It would be nice if the cygwin-specific options were documented in the > gcc info file, but they don't appear to be. Don't expect -mno-cygwin > to appear there soon either, because my understanding is that the > -mno-cygwin option will be removed soon because of the surprising > number of people who can't seem to grasp the concept of no-cygwin. Do you mean this thread: Is there some more recent discussion on this that I've missed somewhere? Cheers, Ralph -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/