X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Eric Blake <ebb9 AT byu DOT net>
Subject:  Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated [experimental]: git-1.6.0-1 [attn: tig maintainer]
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:15:23 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 19
Message-ID:  <loom.20080820T141257-882@post.gmane.org>
References:  <announce DOT 48AC0EC8 DOT 20503 AT byu DOT net>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Eric Blake <ebb9 <at> byu.net> writes:

> NEWS:
> =====
> This is a new upstream release.  It moves most helper scripts (such as
> git-add) out of /bin, so you should now use 'git add' rather than
> 'git-add'.

At least tig is impacted by this change; I'm now seeing the following:

$ tig
/bin/sh: git-config: command not found

Can maintainers of git-related packages refresh their packages accordingly?

-- 
Eric Blake




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/