X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:39:32 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Bug in cygcheck (1.7)
Message-ID: <20080819083932.GN21040@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <48A8188E DOT 4030203 AT elite-systems DOT org> <20080817165425 DOT GA3708 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <48A85BA5 DOT 20501 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <48A8E552 DOT 3070803 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20080818032220 DOT GA28914 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <48A8F8A7 DOT 8080805 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20080818133930 DOT GK21040 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20080818141142 DOT GA32164 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20080818143410 DOT GM21040 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20080818164109 DOT GA2384 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080818164109.GA2384@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Aug 18 12:41, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 04:34:10PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Aug 18 10:11, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 03:39:30PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> >So it's the FreeLibrary call which triggers the problem.  What I don't
> >> >understand so far is, why it does.
> >> 
> >> Does this have any effect?
> >
> >Unfortunately not, it doesn't even change the frequency in which it
> >occurs.  I can so far only fix the problem by avoiding to call
> >FreeLibrary.  Disabling the call to shared_destroy from dll_entry
> >doesn't help either.
> 
> Did you try commenting out the stuff in DLL_THREAD_DETACH too?  Looking at
> the code, it *shouldn't* be an issue but if it was actually getting called
> there would be all sorts of repercussions.

Yes, I did.  It didn't change anything, as you suspected.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/