X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:15:34 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Bug in cygcheck (1.7) Message-ID: <20080817171534.GA31517@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <48A787F0 DOT 408 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <48A8188E DOT 4030203 AT elite-systems DOT org> <20080817165425 DOT GA3708 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <48A85BA5 DOT 20501 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48A85BA5.20501@cwilson.fastmail.fm> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:11:01PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> I can't duplicate this either. > >Very strange. I'll see if I can't build a debug version of cygcheck and >figure out what's going on. > >> FWIW, the Cygwin version shouldn't really matter since cygcheck is >> nearly a pure-windows program. > >True -- but it is the version of cygcheck that shipped with the >cygwin-1.7.0-28 package, from the 2008-08-15 CVS. cygcheck versions are really only loosely coupled to cygwin versions, though. "cygcheck --version" output would be slightly more useful when reporting cygcheck problems. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/