X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <489C668C.2070200@nc.rr.com> Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:30:20 -0400 From: Burt Silverman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.5.25 : Very slow command References: <4899EC23 DOT 8030605 AT nc DOT rr DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4899EC23.8030605@nc.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Adding "title" to the CYGWIN variable (e.g., CYGWIN = title) in Cygwin.bat as per the user manual gives a tremendous psychological advantage, lowering the slow start pain, as one can see that things are really happening. "ls" is working perfectly fine -- I will reboot if I ever see it behave slowly again compared to Windows native "dir" command. Burt Silverman wrote: > Just confirming Bruno DeLoroux observation that cygwin starts very > very slowly on some Windows XP installations. And "ls" is fairly > slow. My Desktop PC is generally faster than my laptop, but the > situation is reversed with regards to these cygwin activities; startup > is painful on the Desktop. > > Burt > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/