X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 22:53:14 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Does anyone use insight on cygwin? Message-ID: <20080805025314.GE13120@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20080804233810 DOT GA13054 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4897A784 DOT 8040703 AT byu DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4897A784.8040703@byu.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 07:06:12PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > According to Christopher Faylor on 8/4/2008 5:38 PM: > | Does anyone actually use insight on Cygwin? > >I generally debug with raw gdb, not insight, but I have used it. But I >also generally run X, so I don't mind if insight depends on X. On the >other hand, if you do package a cygwin tcl, please split the gdb >package so that users can download just gdb without dragging in tcl and >X if they feel they can get by without insight. Yes. That is why I asked about this, after all. We obviously can't have gdb relying on X. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/