X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4894C2E5.D6B59F1F@dessent.net> Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:26:13 -0700 From: Brian Dessent X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Weird filesystem permissions issue. References: <200808022013 DOT m72KDwG9011873 AT mail DOT pdinc DOT us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Jason Pyeron wrote: > Would that explain: Explain what? > Note the double take1 and take2 There's nothing wrong with having a system entry and a user entry for the same path. The user entry takes precendence, to allow for the user to customize a systemwide setting. > I am going to be compiling out-of-tree add-on languages. GHDL in particular. Right but my point is more that unless you have run into a situation where the source requires it, you can just avoid managed mounts entirely. And the plain FSF gcc doesn't, as far as I know, only one of (D or Pascal) so unless you are building one of those, or unless you've identified something in GHDL that does, you can skip all this nonsense. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/