X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: screen is not dead? Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:34:11 -0400 Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive: encrypt X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > And so I settled for the self-conclusion > that this was a 'dead' package, waiting for someone to look at... No, the package is not dead. Cygwin has the latest release, version 4.0.3, and I'm not aware of any current problem reports on it. > So, can you tell me if these hanging problems were after all fixed, > and I'm the only one with them? Or is this just a matter of luck, > because I've now seen some mails of people talking so good of this > cygwin package...? It's true that there used to be a lot of bug reports about screen in Cygwin. Most of them had to do with reattaches failing. When I put the package out last year, I rounded up and included all of the available patches to address such problems. Meanwhile, Cygwin has continued to mature. Whatever the reason, since the package came out I've only seen one problem report, which had something to do with permissions on socket files, IIRC. I believe it got at least partially fixed by the end of the thread. Why don't you try it yourself? The worst that will happen is that you'll have some hung processes that you'll have to kill. Please post any problem reports to this list. Andrew. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/