X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:45:23 +0100 From: "Julio Emanuel" To: "Cygwin Mailing list" Subject: screen is not dead? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi all, I saw some mails ago some references to the 'screen' command. Well I myself had (and still have) some needs that were just asking for the 'screen' panacea, and so I tried it. Unfortunately, I had quite a bad time trying to put it to work, and then I gave up, and turned out using the (tiny brilliant) utility 'dtach'. That's ok for me, because I really was looking for the detachment feature of screen, and nothing else. But when I've researching what about was the screen problem, I saw some threads referring to the very same problem I had: the 'screen' command hangs almost all the times I've tried to re-attach a session (or even do an 'screen -ls'). And so I settled for the self-conclusion that this was a 'dead' package, waiting for someone to look at... So, can you tell me if these hanging problems were after all fixed, and I'm the only one with them? Or is this just a matter of luck, because I've now seen some mails of people talking so good of this cygwin package...? ___________ Julio Costa -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/