X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4877EE58.8090608@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:35:52 -0500 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: perl-5.10.0-4 -> perl-5.10.0-5 site_perl update needed References: <6910a60807100116g628cf204yeb1c43cbece6802a AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <487670DA DOT 80009 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4877523F DOT 9020905 AT x-ray DOT at> <4877D50D DOT 1080504 AT x-ray DOT at> In-Reply-To: <4877D50D.1080504@x-ray.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Reini Urban wrote: | The p5p statement was that it is legal to ADD functions, and it is | illegal to REMOVE functions during the 5.10 cycle. | So it's not comparable to the 5.8 case, where structs were changed. OK, that makes sense. | So breakage only occurs if a new XS library (here DateTime::Locale) | calls an old XS library (here Params::Validate) without this new function. | This would have happened with 5.10.1 also. I did notice that a gtk2-perl program did run after the upgrade to -5. So how can I detect if an XS module needs to rebuilt or not? Yaakov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkh37lgACgkQpiWmPGlmQSP2MwCggjVR1nQATzLdqI1BKQjGXydA 5YMAoKOAwLo0S4vGuHyr+BN89bIIye4b =ngKI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/