X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:30:19 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Get the cygwin PID of a Win PID Message-ID: <20080627113019.GB20180@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jun 27 13:58, Borislav Ivanov wrote: > Thank you again, > > I looked further and found out that this happens when I start the > mysql-nt application from bash. > > Here's the result when I start it from cmd - only one process listed > with equal cywgin and win PIDs: > > D:>mysql\bin\mysqld-nt.exe --defaults-file=conf\mysql.conf > > bash-3.2$ ps -W | grep mysql > 6044 0 0 6044 ? 0 13:24:25 > D:\mysql\bin\mysqld-nt.exe > > And then the bash version: > > bash-3.2$ mysql/bin/mysqld-nt.exe --defaults-file=conf/mysql.conf > > bash-3.2$ ps -W | grep mysql > 992 4572 992 5900 con 500 14:35:13 > /drives/d/mysql/bin/mysqld-nt > 5900 0 0 5900 ? 0 14:35:14 > d:\mysql\bin\mysqld-nt.exe > > The funny thing is that with cygwin 1.3 both commands invoked only one > process. This is mysql 5.0.38. My question is: Is there a way to make > this work like in 1.3 (producing only one process with the same pid I > can use later), or I should look for a workaround? The process is apparently a native Windows process. I don't know why it shows up twice when started from bash but since it's a native process, Cygwin's kill will not work as expected on it. 1.3 is long gone, and things have considerably changed since then. I don't know the exact difference, but kill() is supposed to send a POSIX signal, which native applications have no idea about. You should rather use the native taskkill command to kill native processes. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/