X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <486331F8.7090503@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:06:48 -0700
From: Paul Newell <pnewell AT cs DOT cmu DOT edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
CC: pnewell AT cs DOT cmu DOT edu
Subject: Re: Fwd: md5sum using Cygwin in Windows
References: <85bc5e0a0806230214v72b2f28aoc6fa700521d4af1f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <85bc5e0a0806231440m5cfa1b53q9dbb63cfba616bf0 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <85bc5e0a0806231442r2eab9420q957f2a08a269875a AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20080623231750 DOT GB10962 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <85bc5e0a0806241743l685957bge6f13cf8d39d9c26 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20080625025525 DOT GB9424 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4861D84E DOT 5010505 AT cs DOT cmu DOT edu> <20080625062640 DOT GA23592 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To: <20080625062640.GA23592@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

My thanks for offering the "if Cygwin is based on anything it would be 
FreeBSD, not Linux". I took the link I posted too literally.

There was no point to be missed in OP's purpose as I couldn't have cared 
less what his purpose was.

Though I still dislike "Wow! Zing!", I agree with your stated reasons 
excluding not caring if someone learns Unix (and allow me to alter your 
sentence to include Linux). You're not paid, this is all volunteer, I 
would think you'd want folks to learn it as all your free labor is in 
support of folks that have vested in that workflow. But you are right to 
say that if you want to play in the game, you gotta invest in learning 
the rules. So maybe "Wow!" clears that bar.

I consider this thread closed with a thanks for your replying..

Next time I send an email, it will be after I have hopefully done due 
"modicum of time" (this is meant seriously with respect to the nature of 
the email forum, not as a slight as the quotes might mistakenly imply).

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:31:58PM -0700, Paul Newell wrote:
>   
>> "Wow!  Zing!" ???
>>
>> Hum ...
>>
>> I would think a simple "yes, understanding Unix/Linux before dealing
>> with Cygwin" would have been a bit more professional ..  or, probably
>> more to the point, encouraging one to pursue learning Unix/Linux.
>>     
>
> think "Wow! Zing!" was not anyone trying to be professional or
> encouraging.  I very much do not care what version of Linux someone uses
> and do not care if someone learns Unix.  I do think that people should
> spend a modicum of time familiarizing themselves with something before
> offering criticisms, suggestions, or advice, however.  If they can't be
> bothered to do that, and want to lecture or criticize, they should be
> prepared not to be taken very seriously.
>
> Oh and FYI, this isn't paid support and no one here has to make any
> effort whatsoever to be "professional".
>
>   
>> Regarding his comment of Ubuntu being "newbie-friendly", I live in a
>> RH/Fedora world and I was advised by Linux folks I respect to not try
>> to bring my own system up under Ubuntu as it would confuse me since I
>> am a programmer and not a sysAdmin guru.  I'm not advocating RH/Fedora,
>> but flavors on Linux are important and following this post gives me the
>> sense that Cygwin is RH based (underscored by
>> http://www.redhat.com/software/cygwin/).  Hence, that might be a better
>> model towards his understanding Linux and then Cygwin.
>>     
>
> You're wrong.  You're using software from http://cygwin.com/ .  It is not
> "RH based" in any way.  I use Ubuntu and Gentoo on the systems where I
> develop Cygwin.  Some package developers possibly don't have any Linux
> system whatsoever.
>
> As far as actual code in Cygwin is concerned, you could make the case that
> if Cygwin is "based" on anything it would be FreeBSD, not Linux.
>
> You seem to be missing the point that the only reason the OP downloaded
> Cygwin was to install Ubuntu.
>
>   
>> (the person who might be referred to in cgf's "Hmm.  Just got a similar
>> question on irc a while ago.Cygwin doesn't use : or \." (23jun08, same
>> thread) which may be fundamental but still a necessary learning
>> experience by doing wrong and being corrected ...  twice)
>>     
>
> Your confusion about /cygdrive was in email, not irc.  If you really
> were the person who was asking on irc that would qualify as being
> confused four times since I had to repeat myself there at least twice.
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>
>   


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/