X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:43:16 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Bash startup problems on Windows 2008 server Message-ID: <20080625144316.GR20180@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <87fxr13eam DOT fsf AT dod DOT no> <20080625131258 DOT GQ20180 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jun 25 10:20, Mark J. Reed wrote: > I know this is a lame suggestion, but I figure it can't hurt to throw > it out there anyway: > > Does explicitly running setup.exe as Administrator make any difference here? > > I wouldn't expect it to matter on Vista, but perhaps Server '08, in > the name of heightened security for servers, doesn't do the automatic > privilege escalation for setup programs? Interesting suggestion, but I doubt it. Setup.exe works really fine for me, with UAC enabled. However, trying that doesn't hurt, right? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/