X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <20080620151651.2932@blackhawk> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:16:51 +0900 From: wynfield AT gmail DOT com To: Subject: Re: gtk2 In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:43:21 -0500 <485B1949.3080207@users.sourceforge.net> References: <20080620110651 DOT 3160 AT blackhawk> <485B1949 DOT 3080207 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3+cvs; GNU Mailutils 1.9.90; GNU Emacs 23.0.50 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com I have "usr/bin/cyggtk-x11-2.0-0.dll" - /usr/bin/cyggtk-1-2-0.dll and - /usr/bin/cyggtk-x11-2.0-0.dll The Do you think the naming convention be a problem? Could that be the problem-- here is the script in the Makefile.pl file: %pkgcfg_gtk, %pkgcfg_pango); unless (eval { %pkgcfg_gtk = ExtUtils::PkgConfig->find ("gtk+-2.0 >= $build_reqs{'Gtk+'}"); %pkgcfg_pango = ExtUtils::PkgConfig->find ('pango'); 1; }) Still no can build? regards --- Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: > wynfield AT gmail DOT com wrote: > | I'm working to install a perl package&application. > | *** can not find package gtk+-2.0 >= 2.0.0 > | *** check that it is properly installed and available in PKG_CONFIG_PATH > | > | -------- > | I suspect that the gtk+-1.2.10-2 is the gtk+ library and the problem > is that > | it is not gtk+-2 or a newer version. > | > | If so I'd like news from the gtk maintainer about any updates to gtk2. > | > | If I am wrong and cygwin has this libarary package, please, give me > its name. > > gtk2-x11(-devel) > > > Yaakov > > -- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/