X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4858032C.3040408@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:32:12 -0500 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: {octave,octave-doc,octave-devel}-3.0.1-1 and octave-forge-20080507-1 References: <4856D13C DOT 4060106 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <301593 DOT 36410 DOT qm AT web25004 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> In-Reply-To: <301593.36410.qm@web25004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Marco Atzeri wrote: | --- "Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)" ha scritto: |> Since .oct files are just DLLs, should they be |> treated as such by cygport (and perhaps rebaseall)? | | I am not sure about what you mean. | Could you clarify a bit? cygport would: * strip(1) them before packaging; * check them with objdump(1) for binary dependencies. rebaseall would * rebase them together with other .dll and .so libraries. Yaakov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkhYAywACgkQpiWmPGlmQSPQSACeMdg/NR60UW4SzcH+T4869OJm mm0AnjC5UtpJG2G/W2EtbZDbb9ZPlzb+ =bWzg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/