X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=X0YRTkLcJUAA:10 a=EZzNYb4pjGYA:10 a=xe8BsctaAAAA:8 a=b_L9ffJEatO7qTJRJ6UA:9 a=FMk67DFSAxevjGZF3lDvF1Ym06sA:4 a=eDFNAWYWrCwA:10 a=rPt6xJ-oxjAA:10 Message-ID: <484492FB.2090704@byu.net> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:40:27 -0600 From: Eric Blake User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080421 Thunderbird/2.0.0.14 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Compiling cygwin from cvs and undefined section reference to .gnu_debuglink in cygwin.sc line143 (there is no 143) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 According to Brian Keener on 6/2/2008 6:16 PM: | Remembering I meant to check the FAQ for any extra instructions on | building a debug Cygwin I checked there but still didn't find any clue. I think the difference is in the recent upgrade of binutils, but I haven't yet downgraded binutils back to the older 2006* version to prove my suspicion. - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake ebb9 AT byu DOT net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkhEkvsACgkQ84KuGfSFAYAaJwCePxFsAdbIyf+4VVi7P/pbaIFv xR0An3Jwc9RrRkImBySfzDHLPtjYoIYx =qhNc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/