X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=xe8BsctaAAAA:8 a=G_bJnr4cZnkxuG5G-tMA:9 a=wuUFOjomISwSp-MYQ0uRx1BQ9fAA:4 a=eDFNAWYWrCwA:10 a=rPt6xJ-oxjAA:10 Message-ID: <48316B62.4080108@byu.net> Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 05:58:26 -0600 From: Eric Blake User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080421 Thunderbird/2.0.0.14 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, rnissl AT gmx DOT de Subject: Re: fork performance References: <48310648 DOT 90406 AT gmx DOT de> In-Reply-To: <48310648.90406@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 According to Reinhard Nissl on 5/18/2008 10:47 PM: | running the following command sequence in bash yields little numbers | compared to a real unix system: | | Is there a chance to speedup performance? Only if you know how to improve Windows itself to allow fork() semantics natively instead of emulated. - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake ebb9 AT byu DOT net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkgxa2IACgkQ84KuGfSFAYDWSACgtb0/pARC5K1ivaBHqFqSvxjZ TwYAoKnT852XAl6Qkduzg3eDN8p7Ucvj =jgjY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/